Why Are People So Opposed to Abortion?

inori "most people have children not because of the child but because it will make THEM happy."

Exactly Inori but unfortunately I see a lot of unhappy people walking around with kids and they are mistreating those kids. A lot of fathers abandoning their babies, a lot of mothers slapping their babies upside the head because they have no patience. It seems that these mothers only like the part where they 'have the baby' and get the initial attention. But they really have no clue and are ill prepared to deal with the live squirming wiggling 'new life' that requires 24/7 care. I see mothers slapping a 2 year old because the child is crying and the mom just wants the baby to be quiet! I'm thinking why did you have a baby in the first place if you didn't want it to 'act' like an actual 'BABY? duh? Babies aren't quiet. The only way they know how to communicate is to cry. If they could say like adults. " I'm hungry, tired, bored, cranky' then they wouldn't have the need to cry. Too many folks having babies with no patience to be 'parents'. Anyone can 'have a baby' but it takes time/energy/attention to be an 'active parent'. More folks should have abortions if they find themselves faced with an unwanted pregnancy. More men should have vasectomies and stop making babies with women when they have no intention of being a father.

A fetus is very much a parasite. A parasite merely means a life form that sustains itself at the expense of its host. That is EXACTLY what fetuses do. A developing baby will take the nutrients it needs to grow right out of the mother's vital organs and bones, leaving her forever depleted and damaged.

Secondly, all the do gooder whining in the world won't change my stance. You think having a child in an environment where it has little to no food, no furniture, no way to do homework, no books or supplies, abusive parents, no one to care about it, drugs or prostitution, lack of medical care, attention, affection etc. by stupid parents is not suffering huh?

See what I mean about you types? You never think of the child, you only think about yourself and what YOU want. If you really cared about that "innocent baby" you would have a house full of foster children or adopted children or both yourself. Or you would certainly be giving money, clothes and food to some parents too broke to support their own child.

If you really cared about the "innocent baby" you certainly would not want yet another unwanted child, placed in a situation where it was not wanted and shown no kindness, just so you could feel vindicated that people were keeping their children. (Rolling my eyes).

Thank you Deborrah Cooper, thank you, thank you, thank you!

David: "Men and women need to exercise more self-restraint and abstain from sexual activity until the benchmarks of having adequate personal maturity, financial resources,and education have been passed before they even become sexually active in the first place"

I think people should have 'responsible sex'. One can have sex without making 'babies' that's what birth control is for. And while no birth control if full proof, the odds of making a baby go down considerably if people had responsible sex. The only time a man and a woman make a baby is when they 'both want to. This means when a man and a woman engage in bareback sex they are both complicit in the understanding that they are risking making a baby. Since they both know this can happen they must want it to happen since neither took precautions to prevent an 'accidental' pregnancy'. I do agree that people should value their 'temples/bodies' more and not share it indiscriminately with others. That is a privilege that should be 'earned' and not freely given.